Skip to the content
rent vs buy .cityCheck your city

The 5% rule for rent vs buy

Multiply a home's price by 5%, then divide by 12 to calculate the rent where costs break even. Across 756 US cities, the shortcut and our full 7-year verdict agree 67% of the time.

Rent has a ceiling you can set quickly with the 5 percent rule rent vs buy test. Take the home's price, multiply by 5%, then divide by 12. If the monthly rent for a similar place is under that figure, this shortcut favors renting. Across 756 US cities, we tested that calculation against our 7-year model and got a clear verdict. It gets 508 cities right, or 67%, and misses in 248. Each miss points in the same direction.

What does the 5% rule for rent vs buy mean?

It offers a quick comparison of the costs of renting and owning that you can't recover. Housing costs that never return to you are called unrecoverable costs. Rent dollars are all unrecoverable. Owning also has unrecoverable bills: property taxes, repairs, loan interest and stock gains you miss on your cash.

In a rent vs buy video from 2019, portfolio manager Ben Felix shared the shortcut. At 5%, a $500,000 home carries $25,000 in unrecoverable costs each year, or $2,083 a month. If you rent for less than $2,083, renting wins. Flip it around: $3,000 a month in rent lines up with a $720,000 home.

A typical $332,700 US home puts the 5% line at $1,386 a month, a bit below the $1,413 median rent. Ramit Sethi, a finance writer, tells CNBC a similar thing. Rent gets you a roof and a landlord who takes care of repairs.

Working out the 5 percent rule rent vs buy math

Find the monthly rent where costs break even by multiplying the home's price by 5% for yearly costs, then dividing by 12. In symbols: `value x 5% / 12`.

Felix set the 5% figure using 3 annual ownership costs:

  • Property taxes, set at 1% of the value of the home.
  • Maintenance on the home, at 1% of value.
  • Cost of capital, set at 3% of the value of the home.

Cost of capital covers your borrowing costs plus the stock gains you give up with your down payment. In April 2019 mortgages sat near 3%, so Felix set the debt rate at 3%. Cash down numbers came from global real returns between 1900 and 2017, with housing up 1.3% a year and stocks up 5.2%. His forward estimates have stocks 3.57% ahead of real estate, which he rounded down to 3%. For conservative or taxable investors, he suggests closer to 4% rather than 5%, which he calls an oversimplification.

Putting the shortcut to the test across 813 US cities

A yearly hurdle of 5% corresponds to a price-to-rent ratio of 20. You divide a home's price by its annual rent to get this ratio. When a home costs 20 times a year's rent, that year's rent equals 5% of the price. With the shortcut, 20 or less means buy, and more than 20 means rent.

We compared the cutoff with our full 7-year model in 813 US cities. Drop the 57 toss-ups and you get 756 clear verdicts. The shortcut agrees with the model in 508 cities, which is 67%. It misses in 248.

How many of 813 US cities fall in each price to rent band, and which way the 7-year verdict goes in each50100150Price to rent <12: 51 cities where buying winsPrice to rent <12: 2 cities where it's a toss-upPrice to rent <12: 1 cities where renting wins<12Price to rent 12-15: 59 cities where buying winsPrice to rent 12-15: 25 cities where it's a toss-upPrice to rent 12-15: 52 cities where renting wins12-15Price to rent 15-18: 59 cities where buying winsPrice to rent 15-18: 13 cities where it's a toss-upPrice to rent 15-18: 121 cities where renting wins15-18Price to rent 18-21: 7 cities where buying winsPrice to rent 18-21: 17 cities where it's a toss-upPrice to rent 18-21: 118 cities where renting wins18-21Price to rent 21-24: 124 cities where renting wins21-24Price to rent 24-27: 59 cities where renting wins24-27Price to rent 27-30: 37 cities where renting wins27-30Price to rent 30+: 68 cities where renting wins30+CitiesPrice to rent ratio (home price / a year of rent)Renting winsToss-upBuying wins

We used Zillow Home Value and Observed Rent indexes and verdicts from our rent vs buy method with 20% down across 7 years as sources.

Each miss goes in the same direction. Every one of the 248 misses has the shortcut saying buy at 20 or under and the model saying rent. In the other direction, not 1 city misses.

Why does the rule say buy if renting wins?

Today's ownership costs are much higher than what the 2019 shortcut assumes because interest rates and transaction fees are higher. 4 gaps push an owner's yearly cost past 5% during a 7-year stay:

  • Mortgage rates rose to more than twice their former level. Freddie Mac lists a 7.24% average for 30-year fixed mortgages, far above 3% and the January 2021 record of 2.65%.
  • Closing costs get no attention from the rule. They are the fees you pay lenders, agents and local offices when you buy or sell. Buying costs 3.5% and selling costs 6% in our model.
  • The rule leaves out home insurance. A typical US owner spends $1,308 a year on insurance, added to other costs of owning a home.
  • What you pay in local taxes changes from place to place. The US average sits at 0.94%, close to 1%, though our model uses the rate for each city.

The 5% line for a typical $332,700 home equals $1,386 each month. With a 7.24% loan plus insurance and closing costs across 7 years, the true monthly cost reaches $2,950.

CityPrice to rentThe 5% rule saysFull verdict7-year result
Oak Park, IL19.6BuyRentrenting wins by $137k
Wheaton, IL17.8BuyRentrenting wins by $122k
East Orange, NJ19.9BuyRentrenting wins by $114k
Downers Grove, IL18.6BuyRentrenting wins by $112k
Clifton, NJ19.5BuyRentrenting wins by $106k
Plainfield, NJ19.6BuyRentrenting wins by $105k
Union City, NJ19.9BuyRentrenting wins by $98k
Evanston, IL16.8BuyRentrenting wins by $96k
Palatine, IL17.1BuyRentrenting wins by $93k
Hoffman Estates, IL16.5BuyRentrenting wins by $91k
Mount Vernon, NY18.7BuyRentrenting wins by $87k
Fulshear, TX19.8BuyRentrenting wins by $84k
Berwyn, IL17.8BuyRentrenting wins by $84k
Madison, WI19.3BuyRentrenting wins by $79k
Hempstead, NY17.3BuyRentrenting wins by $78k

We used Zillow Home Value and Observed Rent indexes and verdicts from our rent vs buy method with 20% down across 7 years as sources.

Using this rent vs buy rule of thumb today

Use the 5% cutoff as a quick filter, not a final verdict. If monthly rent is under the 5% line, buying loses to renting and investing over 7 years. Each time the shortcut chooses rent, the complete city model agrees.

If rent sits above the 5% line, don't assume buying wins. The typical home's full yearly ownership cost is well above 5% of its price when mortgage rates are 7.24%. Use our city pages to check your town, or test your numbers with the rent vs buy calculator.

Objections, crossed out

  • The 5% rule ignores home price growth

    Price growth is folded into the 3% cost of capital. It weighs past housing gains against what stocks returned. Stocks have historically grown faster than home values after inflation, even when home values rise.

  • My mortgage payment stays fixed while rent rises

    Since 2006, rents have gone up about 3.5% a year. Staying longer helps owners catch up, while the median city reaches break-even in year 10.

  • A 4% rule is fairer than a 5% rule

    For cautious investors, Felix suggested 4% when loans cost 3%. At 7.24% mortgage rates, changing the bar to 4% increases our test's misses from 248 cities to 437.

  • Tax deductions make the rule too harsh on buyers

    You only get help from interest and property tax if you itemize. For 2026, married couples can claim a $32,200 standard deduction. In Year-1, interest and taxes for a typical home total less, so most couples don't itemize.

Read more

Rent vs buy calculator using your city's real numbersPrice versus rent ratioCosts of owning a homeRenting and investing compared with buying